Complaint #200506280, May 2005

Incident: May 28, 2005
Received: June 3, 2005
Closed: November 4, 2005


Reason for contact: Report-domestic dispute
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 23rd Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Jonnette Marzigliano, Jessica Reyes
Officer: Jiles, Rodney
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 23
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Alcantara, Francisco
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 23
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Jiles, Rodney
Complainant: Male, 19
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Pekusic, Gordon
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 23
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Hudson, Richard
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 23
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Jiles, Rodney
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 23
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Jiles, Rodney
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 23
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 21-24
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Jiles, Rodney Hispanic Male, 23 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Alcantara, Francisco Hispanic Male, 23 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Jiles, Rodney Male, 19 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Unsubstantiated
Pekusic, Gordon Hispanic Male, 23 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Hudson, Richard Hispanic Male, 23 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Jiles, Rodney Hispanic Male, 23 Force: Physical force Unfounded
Jiles, Rodney Hispanic Male, 23 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer Hispanic Male, 21-24 Force: Physical force Unfounded

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.