Complaint #200507232, June 2005

Incident: June 25, 2005
Received: June 27, 2005
Closed: January 24, 2006


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 5th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime
Officer: Chin, Kenny
Complainant: Black Male, 33
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
CCRB Conclusion: Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer: Crimmins, Brian
Complainant: Black Male, 33
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Crimmins, Brian
Complainant: Black Male, 33
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Mortimer, Luis
Complainant: Black Male, 33
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Mortimer, Luis
Complainant: Black Male, 33
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Chin, Kenny Black Male, 33 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer Black Male, 30-34 Force: Gun Pointed Officer(s) Unidentified
Crimmins, Brian Black Male, 33 Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Exonerated
Crimmins, Brian Black Male, 33 Abuse of Authority: Other Exonerated
Mortimer, Luis Black Male, 33 Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Unsubstantiated
Mortimer, Luis Black Male, 33 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.