Complaint #200509423, August 2005

Incident: August 14, 2005
Received: August 15, 2005
Closed: June 21, 2006


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 78th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Summons - disorderly conduct

Witness Officers: Maria Hernandez, Jeremy Jeske, Christophe Mcsweeney
Officer: Kirshy, Mitchell
Complainant: Black Male, 29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Kirshy, Mitchell
Complainant: Black Male, 29
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Offensive Language: Disability
CCRB Conclusion: Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer: Henry, Scott
Complainant: Black Male, 29
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Henry, Scott
Complainant: Black Male, 29
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
CCRB Conclusion: Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Kirshy, Mitchell Black Male, 29 Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Exonerated
Kirshy, Mitchell Black Male, 29 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Unknown Officer Black Male, 25-29 Offensive Language: Disability Officer(s) Unidentified
Unknown Officer Black Male, 25-29 Force: Physical force Officer(s) Unidentified
Henry, Scott Black Male, 29 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Henry, Scott Black Male, 29 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer Black Male, 25-29 Offensive Language: Race Officer(s) Unidentified

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.