Complaint #200511405, September 2005

Incident: September 23, 2005
Received: September 26, 2005
Closed: June 14, 2006

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
In NYPD 104th Precinct Queens
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Officer:	Lembo, Christopher
Complainant:	White Male, 17
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Ackerman, Michael
Complainant:	White Male, 17
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Ackerman, Michael
Complainant:	White Male, 17
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Ackerman, Michael
Complainant:	White Male, 17
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Ackerman, Michael
Complainant:	White Male, 17
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Lembo, Christopher
Complainant:	White Male, 47
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Ackerman, Michael
Complainant:	Male, 16
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Lembo, Christopher	White Male, 17	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)	Unsubstantiated
Ackerman, Michael	White Male, 17	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop	Unsubstantiated
Ackerman, Michael	White Male, 17	Abuse of Authority: Frisk	Exonerated
Ackerman, Michael	White Male, 17	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Ackerman, Michael	White Male, 17	Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons	Unsubstantiated
Lembo, Christopher	White Male, 47	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Ackerman, Michael	Male, 16	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.