Complaint #200515461, December 2005

Incident: December 24, 2005
Received: December 28, 2005
Closed: June 15, 2007

Document: Complaint Closing Report

Reason for contact: Report-gun possession/shots fired
Location: Commercial building
In NYPD 67th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Summons - disorderly conduct

Witness Officers: Salman Asghar, Kimberly Curry, Joshua Dawson, Daryl Denner, Jamie Gifkins, Quincy Grigsby, Igor Groysman, Carla Ledgister, Raymond Quick, Robert Reed

Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Black Female, 25-29
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Ceparano, Bruce
Complainant:	Black Female, 26
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Centeno, Mayra
Complainant:	Black Female, 26
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Black Female, 25-29
Allegation:	Force: Hit against inanimate object
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Napoleon, Johnny
Complainant:	Black Female, 26
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Ceparano, Bruce
Complainant:	Black Female, 26
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Unknown Officer	Black Female, 25-29	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Ceparano, Bruce	Black Female, 26	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Centeno, Mayra	Black Female, 26	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Unknown Officer	Black Female, 25-29	Force: Hit against inanimate object	Unfounded
Napoleon, Johnny	Black Female, 26	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint	Unfounded
Ceparano, Bruce	Black Female, 26	Force: Physical force	Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.