Complaint #200600015, December 2005

Incident: December 30, 2005
Received: January 1, 2006
Closed: March 30, 2007


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 32nd Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Dennis Kenefick, Said Salim, Ralph Sherlock
Officer: Cosgrove, James
Complainant: Black Male, 23
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Cosgrove, James
Complainant: Black Male, 23
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Cosgrove, James
Complainant: Black Male, 23
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Cosgrove, James
Complainant: Black Male, 23
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Cosgrove, James
Complainant: Black Male, 23
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Cosgrove, James Black Male, 23 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Substantiated (Charges)
Cosgrove, James Black Male, 23 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Substantiated (Charges)
Cosgrove, James Black Male, 23 Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Substantiated (Charges)
Cosgrove, James Black Male, 23 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Unsubstantiated
Cosgrove, James Black Male, 23 Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Unsubstantiated

Penalty

Cosgrove, James
No Disciplinary Action-DUP
No penalty


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.