Complaint #200601011, July 2005

Incident: July 2, 2005
Received: January 24, 2006
Closed: October 13, 2006


Reason for contact: Moving violation
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 9th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Travis Ross
Officer: Kuliecza, Nicholas
Complainant: Black Male, 55
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Kuliecza, Nicholas
Complainant: Black Male, 55
Allegation: Force: Handcuffs too tight
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Kuliecza, Nicholas
Complainant: Black Male, 55
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Kuliecza, Nicholas
Complainant: Black Male, 55
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Kuliecza, Nicholas
Complainant: Black Male, 39
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Kuliecza, Nicholas Black Male, 55 Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Unsubstantiated
Kuliecza, Nicholas Black Male, 55 Force: Handcuffs too tight Unsubstantiated
Kuliecza, Nicholas Black Male, 55 Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Exonerated
Kuliecza, Nicholas Black Male, 55 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Exonerated
Kuliecza, Nicholas Black Male, 39 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Substantiated (Command Discipline)

Penalty

Kuliecza, Nicholas
Command Discipline - A


Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.