Complaint #200601142, January 2006

Incident: January 25, 2006
Received: January 26, 2006
Closed: May 29, 2007

Reason for contact: Report-possession/sale of narcotics
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 106th Precinct Queens
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Thomas Alcamo, Timothy Downing

Officer:	Barrett, Sean
Complainant:	Black Female, 19
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Garitta, Anthony
Complainant:	Black Male, 21
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Venturino, Joseph
Complainant:	Black Male, 21
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Miscellaneous - Subject Retired
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion:	Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Officer:	Marks, Philip
Complainant:	Black Female, 19
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Barrett, Sean
Complainant:	Black Female, 19
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Marks, Philip
Complainant:	Black Female, 44
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Barrett, Sean	Black Female, 19	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop	Exonerated
Garitta, Anthony	Black Male, 21	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop	Exonerated
Venturino, Joseph	Black Male, 21	Discourtesy: Word	Miscellaneous - Subject Retired
Unknown Officer		Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest	Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Marks, Philip	Black Female, 19	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search	Exonerated
Barrett, Sean	Black Female, 19	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search	Exonerated
Marks, Philip	Black Female, 44	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.