Complaint #200602423, February 2006

Incident: February 10, 2006
Received: February 24, 2006
Closed: December 4, 2006


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 69th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Summons - disorderly conduct

Witness Officers: Michael Freed, Clint Mcpherson
Officer: Paul, Nigel
Complainant: Black Male, 22
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Cappitelli, Peter
Complainant: Black Male, 22
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Paul, Nigel
Complainant: Black Female, 47
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Paul, Nigel
Complainant: Black Male, 22
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Cappitelli, Peter
Complainant: Black Male, 25
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Cappitelli, Peter
Complainant: Black Male, 25
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Paul, Nigel
Complainant: Black Male, 22
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Paul, Nigel Black Male, 22 Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Exonerated
Cappitelli, Peter Black Male, 22 Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Exonerated
Paul, Nigel Black Female, 47 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Unsubstantiated
Paul, Nigel Black Male, 22 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated
Cappitelli, Peter Black Male, 25 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated
Cappitelli, Peter Black Male, 25 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Exonerated
Paul, Nigel Black Male, 22 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.