Complaint #200602745, March 2006

Incident: March 1, 2006
Received: March 3, 2006
Closed: June 15, 2007


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 103rd Precinct Queens
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Dominick Delorenzo
Officer: Bourguignon, William
Complainant: Black Male, 36
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Bourguignon, William
Complainant: Black Male, 36
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Bourguignon, William
Complainant: Black Male, 36
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Carman, David
Complainant: Black Male, 36
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Carman, David
Complainant: Black Male, 36
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Carman, David
Complainant: Black Male, 36
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Bourguignon, William Black Male, 36 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Unsubstantiated
Bourguignon, William Black Male, 36 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated
Bourguignon, William Black Male, 36 Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Exonerated
Carman, David Black Male, 36 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated
Carman, David Black Male, 36 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Unsubstantiated
Carman, David Black Male, 36 Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Exonerated
Unknown Officer Black Male, 35-39 Discourtesy: Word Officer(s) Unidentified

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.