Complaint #200603013, March 2006

Incident: March 8, 2006
Closed: August 9, 2007


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 47th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Summons - disorderly conduct

Witness Officers: David Bonacarti
Officer: Jeanty, Aurclien
Complainant: Black Male, 27
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Jeanty, Aurclien
Complainant: Black Male, 27
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Jeanty, Aurclien
Complainant: Black Male, 27
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Whitlock, James
Complainant: Black Male, 27
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Jeanty, Aurclien
Complainant: Black Male, 27
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Whitlock, James
Complainant: Black Male, 27
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Alston, Peter
Complainant: Black Male, 27
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Jeanty, Aurclien
Complainant: Black Male, 27
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Jeanty, Aurclien Black Male, 27 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Jeanty, Aurclien Black Male, 27 Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons Unsubstantiated
Jeanty, Aurclien Black Male, 27 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Whitlock, James Black Male, 27 Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Unsubstantiated
Jeanty, Aurclien Black Male, 27 Abuse of Authority: Question Unsubstantiated
Whitlock, James Black Male, 27 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Alston, Peter Black Male, 27 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Jeanty, Aurclien Black Male, 27 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.