Complaint #200604236, April 2006

Incident: April 4, 2006
Closed: December 4, 2006


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 40th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Summons - disorderly conduct
Officer: Baez, Ritchie
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Officer: Baez, Ritchie
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Krug, Clement
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Krug, Clement
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Officer: Krug, Clement
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Baez, Ritchie Hispanic Male, 34 Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Baez, Ritchie Hispanic Male, 34 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Unsubstantiated
Krug, Clement Hispanic Male, 34 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated
Krug, Clement Hispanic Male, 34 Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Krug, Clement Hispanic Male, 34 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Substantiated (Command Discipline)

Penalties

Krug, Clement
No Disciplinary Action-DUP
No penalty

Baez, Ritchie
No Disciplinary Action-DUP
No penalty


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.