Complaint #200606155, May 2006

Incident: May 11, 2006
Closed: September 13, 2007

Reason for contact: Report-dispute
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 44th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Natalie Bishop, Christopher Brady, Zoja Shala, Meyer Weiss

Officer:	Navarro, Robert
Complainant:	Black Male, 13
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Pica, Daniel
Complainant:	Black Male, 13
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Pica, Daniel
Complainant:	Black Male, 13
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Deftereos, Christos
Complainant:	Black Male, 13
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Cruger, James
Complainant:	Black Male, 15
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Cruger, James
Complainant:	Black Male, 15
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Navarro, Robert	Black Male, 13	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Pica, Daniel	Black Male, 13	Abuse of Authority: Frisk	Unfounded
Pica, Daniel	Black Male, 13	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop	Exonerated
Deftereos, Christos	Black Male, 13	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Cruger, James	Black Male, 15	Abuse of Authority: Frisk	Unfounded
Cruger, James	Black Male, 15	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop	Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.