Complaint #200606438, May 2006

Incident: May 16, 2006
Received: May 18, 2006
Closed: December 29, 2006


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 49th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Arrest - disorderly conduct
Officer: Fusaro, Alexander
Complainant: American Indian Male, 24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
CCRB Conclusion: Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer: Grigoli, Joseph
Complainant: American Indian Male, 24
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Kearney, Edmund
Complainant: Black Male, 24
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Kearney, Edmund
Complainant: American Indian Male, 24
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Fusaro, Alexander
Complainant: Black Male, 24
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Fusaro, Alexander
Complainant: American Indian Male, 24
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Fusaro, Alexander American Indian Male, 24 Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer Black Male, 21-24 Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Officer(s) Unidentified
Grigoli, Joseph American Indian Male, 24 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Kearney, Edmund Black Male, 24 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Kearney, Edmund American Indian Male, 24 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Fusaro, Alexander Black Male, 24 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Fusaro, Alexander American Indian Male, 24 Discourtesy: Action Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.