Complaint #200609616, July 2006

Incident: July 22, 2006
Received: July 24, 2006
Closed: July 2, 2007

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 33rd Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Tara Dempsey, Priscilla Garcia

Officer:	Rodriguez, Mark
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 33
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Hispanic Male
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Hispanic Male
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Rodriguez, Mark
Complainant:	Hispanic Male
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Ohara, James
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 33
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Rodriguez, Mark
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 33
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Rodriguez, Mark
Complainant:	Hispanic Male
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Aguero, Paula
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 33
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Rodriguez, Mark	Hispanic Male, 33	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Unknown Officer	Hispanic Male	Discourtesy: Word	Unfounded
Unknown Officer	Hispanic Male	Force: Physical force	Unfounded
Rodriguez, Mark	Hispanic Male	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest	Exonerated
Ohara, James	Hispanic Male, 33	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Rodriguez, Mark	Hispanic Male, 33	Force: Physical force	Unfounded
Rodriguez, Mark	Hispanic Male	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)	Unfounded
Aguero, Paula	Hispanic Male, 33	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.