Complaint #200611698, September 2006

Incident: September 5, 2006
Closed: March 1, 2007

Reason for contact: C/V at PCT to file complaint of crime
Location: Police building
In NYPD 100th Precinct Queens
Outcome: Summons - disorderly conduct

Witness Officers: William Rapp

Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	White Male, 80-99
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer:	Terranova, Thea
Complainant:	White Male, 85
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Caridi, Michael
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Moore, Maurice
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Caridi, Michael
Complainant:	White Male, 85
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Moore, Maurice
Complainant:	White Male, 85
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Caridi, Michael
Complainant:	White Male, 85
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Unknown Officer	White Male, 80-99	Force: Physical force	Officer(s) Unidentified
Terranova, Thea	White Male, 85	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Caridi, Michael		Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched	Exonerated
Moore, Maurice		Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched	Exonerated
Caridi, Michael	White Male, 85	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number	Unsubstantiated
Moore, Maurice	White Male, 85	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number	Unsubstantiated
Caridi, Michael	White Male, 85	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest	Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.