Complaint #200614666, October 2006

Incident: October 28, 2006
Received: November 2, 2006
Closed: November 5, 2007


Reason for contact: Other
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 28th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Summons - disorderly conduct
Officer: Cousinhayes, Michael
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 22
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Cousinhayes, Michael
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 22
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Salmeron, Angelica
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 20
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Cousinhayes, Michael
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 22
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Salmeron, Angelica
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 22
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Salmeron, Angelica
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 22
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Cousinhayes, Michael Hispanic Male, 22 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Cousinhayes, Michael Hispanic Male, 22 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Unsubstantiated
Salmeron, Angelica Hispanic Male, 20 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Substantiated (Charges)
Cousinhayes, Michael Hispanic Male, 22 Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Substantiated (Charges)
Salmeron, Angelica Hispanic Male, 22 Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Substantiated (Charges)
Salmeron, Angelica Hispanic Male, 22 Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons Unsubstantiated

Penalties

Cousinhayes, Michael
No Disciplinary Action-DUP
No penalty

Salmeron, Angelica
No Disciplinary Action-DUP
No penalty


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.