Complaint #200614779, November 2006

Incident: November 3, 2006
Received: November 6, 2006
Closed: October 15, 2007

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - auto
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 109th Precinct Queens
Outcome: Arrest - OGA

Witness Officers: Norbert Heuser

Officer:	Hemans, Ernest
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 23
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Demeo, Joseph
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 24
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Maloney, Martin
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 23
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Hemans, Ernest
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 23
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Hemans, Ernest
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 27
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Officer:	Demeo, Joseph
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 27
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Officer:	Hemans, Ernest
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 23
Allegation:	Force: Hit against inanimate object
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Hemans, Ernest	Hispanic Male, 23	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest	Exonerated
Demeo, Joseph	Hispanic Male, 24	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest	Exonerated
Maloney, Martin	Hispanic Male, 23	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)	Unsubstantiated
Hemans, Ernest	Hispanic Male, 23	Discourtesy: Word	Exonerated
Hemans, Ernest	Hispanic Male, 27	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop	Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Demeo, Joseph	Hispanic Male, 27	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop	Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Hemans, Ernest	Hispanic Male, 23	Force: Hit against inanimate object	Unfounded

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.