Complaint #200615879, September 2006

Incident: September 30, 2006
Received: November 27, 2006
Closed: December 28, 2007


Reason for contact: Other
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 71st Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Gregory Abrahams, Gregory Bell, Herve Francois, Michael Scarcella
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion: Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer: Kirch, Christopher
Complainant: Black Male, 16
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Kirch, Christopher
Complainant: Black Male, 16
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Insauto, Paul
Complainant: Black Male, 18
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Officer: Insauto, Paul
Complainant: Black Male, 18
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Officer: Insauto, Paul
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
CCRB Conclusion: Victim Unidentified
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Unknown Officer Black Male, 21-24 Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Officer(s) Unidentified
Kirch, Christopher Black Male, 16 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated
Kirch, Christopher Black Male, 16 Abuse of Authority: Stop Unsubstantiated
Insauto, Paul Black Male, 18 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Insauto, Paul Black Male, 18 Abuse of Authority: Stop Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Insauto, Paul Force: Hit against inanimate object Victim Unidentified

Penalty

Insauto, Paul
No Disciplinary Action-DUP
No penalty


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.