Complaint #200701508, January 2007

Incident: January 24, 2007
Received: January 29, 2007
Closed: July 17, 2007


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 78th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Juvenile Report

Witness Officers: Terence Daly
Officer: Newkirk, Rosalind
Complainant: Male, 13
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Newkirk, Rosalind
Complainant: Male, 13
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Patel, Roshan
Complainant: Black Male, 13
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Patel, Roshan
Complainant: Black Male, 13
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Patel, Roshan
Complainant: Black Male, 13
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Newkirk, Rosalind
Complainant: Male, 13
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Newkirk, Rosalind
Complainant: Male, 13
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Newkirk, Rosalind
Complainant: Male, 13
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Newkirk, Rosalind Male, 13 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Exonerated
Newkirk, Rosalind Male, 13 Force: Physical force Unfounded
Patel, Roshan Black Male, 13 Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Exonerated
Patel, Roshan Black Male, 13 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated
Patel, Roshan Black Male, 13 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Exonerated
Newkirk, Rosalind Male, 13 Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Exonerated
Newkirk, Rosalind Male, 13 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated
Newkirk, Rosalind Male, 13 Discourtesy: Word Unfounded

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.