Complaint #200702612, January 2007

Incident: January 2, 2007
Received: February 23, 2007
Closed: May 2, 2008


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - auto
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 110th Precinct Queens
Outcome: Other VTL violation summons issued

Witness Officers: Christophe Bramwell, Edgar Gomez, Thierry Nemorin, Vivian Velazquez
Officer: Perez, Michael
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Perez, Michael
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Perez, Michael
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Stiuso, William
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Perez, Michael
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 23
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Perez, Michael Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Substantiated (Charges)
Perez, Michael Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated
Perez, Michael Abuse of Authority: Frisk Exonerated
Stiuso, William Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Exonerated
Perez, Michael Hispanic Male, 23 Force: Gun Pointed Unfounded

Penalty

Perez, Michael
No Disciplinary Action-DUP
No penalty


Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.