Complaint #200706453, May 2007

Incident: May 7, 2007
Received: May 8, 2007
Closed: May 22, 2008


Reason for contact: Report of other crime
Location: Commercial building
In NYPD 45th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Edward Lemp
Officer: Flood, Kristian
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 24
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Flood, Kristian
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 24
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Flood, Kristian
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Flood, Kristian
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Taormina, Nicholas
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Flood, Kristian
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Flood, Kristian Hispanic Male, 24 Force: Physical force Substantiated (Charges)
Flood, Kristian Hispanic Male, 24 Force: Gun Pointed Unsubstantiated
Flood, Kristian Hispanic Male, 24 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Substantiated (Charges)
Flood, Kristian Hispanic Male, 24 Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Unsubstantiated
Taormina, Nicholas Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn Exonerated
Flood, Kristian Hispanic Male, 24 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Substantiated (Charges)

Penalty

Flood, Kristian
Plead Guilty - DCT
Vacation: 30 days


Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.