Complaint #200716592, November 2007

Incident: November 9, 2007
Received: November 14, 2007
Closed: July 7, 2008

Reason for contact: Other
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 23rd Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Officer:	Agate, Robert
Complainant:	Male
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Officer:	Agate, Robert
Complainant:	Male
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Officer:	Agate, Robert
Complainant:	Black Female, 34
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Agate, Robert
Complainant:	Black Female, 34
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Agate, Robert
Complainant:	Black Female, 16
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Bedoya, Jorge
Complainant:	Male
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Officer:	Bedoya, Jorge
Complainant:	Male
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Officer:	Agate, Robert
Complainant:	Male
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Alleged Victim Uncooperative

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Agate, Robert	Male	Force: Physical force	Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Agate, Robert	Male	Abuse of Authority: Stop	Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Agate, Robert	Black Female, 34	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Agate, Robert	Black Female, 34	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number	Unsubstantiated
Agate, Robert	Black Female, 16	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)	Unsubstantiated
Bedoya, Jorge	Male	Abuse of Authority: Stop	Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Bedoya, Jorge	Male	Force: Physical force	Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Agate, Robert	Male	Discourtesy: Word	Alleged Victim Uncooperative

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.