Complaint #200717508, December 2007

Incident: December 4, 2007
Received: December 5, 2007
Closed: August 27, 2008


Reason for contact: Moving violation
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 34th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued
Officer: Reifer, Jonathan
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 21
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Reifer, Jonathan
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 21
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Beattie, William
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 21
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Beattie, William
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 21
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Reifer, Jonathan Hispanic Male, 21 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Unsubstantiated
Reifer, Jonathan Hispanic Male, 21 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Exonerated
Beattie, William Hispanic Male, 21 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Exonerated
Beattie, William Hispanic Male, 21 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Substantiated (Command Discipline)

Penalty

Beattie, William
No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Command Discipline - A


Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.