Complaint #200800444, December 2007

Incident: December 11, 2007
Received: January 9, 2008
Closed: December 16, 2008


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 60th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Nury Arteaga
Officer: Williams, Charles
Complainant: Female, 40
Allegation: Force: Pepper spray
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Giudice, Michael
Complainant: Female, 40
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Dorisme, Samuel
Complainant: Female, 40
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Dorisme, Samuel
Complainant: Female, 40
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Maida, Anthony
Complainant: Female, 40
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Maida, Anthony
Complainant: Female, 40
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Giudice, Michael
Complainant: Female, 40
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Giudice, Michael
Complainant: Female, 40
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Williams, Charles Female, 40 Force: Pepper spray Exonerated
Giudice, Michael Female, 40 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Dorisme, Samuel Female, 40 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Dorisme, Samuel Female, 40 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Maida, Anthony Female, 40 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Maida, Anthony Female, 40 Force: Physical force Unfounded
Giudice, Michael Female, 40 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Giudice, Michael Female, 40 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.