Complaint #200801917, February 2008

Incident: February 7, 2008
Closed: September 2, 2009

Reason for contact: Report-gun possession/shots fired
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 67th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Francis Kiernan

Officer:	Dejesus, Pablo
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat to notify ACS
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Dejesus, Pablo
Complainant:	Black Male, 28
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Question
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Pignatelli, Richard
Complainant:	Black Male, 28
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Jablonski, Mark
Complainant:	Black Male, 28
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Jablonski, Mark
Complainant:	Black Male, 28
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Devine, Kevin
Complainant:	Black Male, 28
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Pignatelli, Richard
Complainant:	Black Male, 28
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Dejesus, Pablo		Abuse of Authority: Threat to notify ACS	Unsubstantiated
Dejesus, Pablo	Black Male, 28	Abuse of Authority: Question	Exonerated
Pignatelli, Richard	Black Male, 28	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number	Unsubstantiated
Jablonski, Mark	Black Male, 28	Abuse of Authority: Frisk	Unsubstantiated
Jablonski, Mark	Black Male, 28	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search	Unsubstantiated
Devine, Kevin	Black Male, 28	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search	Unsubstantiated
Pignatelli, Richard	Black Male, 28	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop	Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.