Complaint #200802182, January 2008

Incident: January 30, 2008
Received: February 12, 2008
Closed: April 30, 2009

Reason for contact: Report-gun possession/shots fired
Location: Residential building
In NYPD 71st Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Adam Alpa, Christopher Bonomo, Emmanuel Cabreja, Anna Carrasco, Michael Cook, Michael Dannecker, Michael Deddo, James Galante, Jacqueline Hoder, Ewa Lapinska, Timothy Murphy, Ali Oklu, Joseph Penny, Nikolaos Stefopoulos, Andrew Uspensky, Scott Wells

Officer:	Oleary, John
Complainant:	Black Male, 17
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Pilnacek, Dolores
Complainant:	Black Male, 17
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Pilnacek, Dolores
Complainant:	Black Female, 18
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Black Male, 15-17
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer:	Ayres, Douglas
Complainant:	Black Male, 17
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Pilnacek, Dolores
Complainant:	Black Female, 18
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Oleary, John	Black Male, 17	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Pilnacek, Dolores	Black Male, 17	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Pilnacek, Dolores	Black Female, 18	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer	Black Male, 15-17	Discourtesy: Word	Officer(s) Unidentified
Ayres, Douglas	Black Male, 17	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Pilnacek, Dolores	Black Female, 18	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)	Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.