Complaint #200815161, October 2008

Incident: October 15, 2008
Received: October 21, 2008
Closed: October 5, 2009

Reason for contact: Other violation of VTL
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 71st Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Jorge Ulloa

Officer:	Petitto, Michael
Complainant:	Black Male
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Petitto, Michael
Complainant:	Black Male
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Petitto, Michael
Complainant:	Black Male
Allegation:	Force: Chokehold
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Bogle, Hugh
Complainant:	Black Male
Allegation:	Force: Gun Pointed
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Petitto, Michael
Complainant:	Black Male
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Petitto, Michael
Complainant:	Black Male
Allegation:	Force: Gun Pointed
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Cody, William
Complainant:	Black Male
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Cody, William
Complainant:	Black Male
Allegation:	Force: Gun Pointed
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Petitto, Michael	Black Male	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Petitto, Michael	Black Male	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Petitto, Michael	Black Male	Force: Chokehold	Unfounded
Bogle, Hugh	Black Male	Force: Gun Pointed	Exonerated
Petitto, Michael	Black Male	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search	Exonerated
Petitto, Michael	Black Male	Force: Gun Pointed	Exonerated
Cody, William	Black Male	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search	Exonerated
Cody, William	Black Male	Force: Gun Pointed	Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.