Complaint #200901190, January 2009

Incident: January 29, 2009
Received: February 24, 2009
Closed: May 3, 2010


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - bldg
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 46th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Thomas Larkin, Vivian Moralesbell
Officer: Gogarty, John
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (No Recommendations)
Officer: Gogarty, John
Complainant: Black Male, 34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 15-17
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer: Gogarty, John
Complainant: Black Male, 34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (No Recommendations)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Gogarty, John Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Substantiated (No Recommendations)
Gogarty, John Black Male, 34 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer Black Male, 25-29 Force: Gun Pointed Unfounded
Unknown Officer Black Male, 25-29 Discourtesy: Word Officer(s) Unidentified
Unknown Officer Black Male, 15-17 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Officer(s) Unidentified
Gogarty, John Black Male, 34 Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest Substantiated (No Recommendations)

Penalty

Gogarty, John
Instructions


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.