Complaint #200902484, February 2009

Incident: February 17, 2009
Closed: June 4, 2010

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - auto
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 101st Precinct Queens
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Officer:	Zacarese, Richard
Complainant:	Black Male, 1
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Ramos, Rafael
Complainant:	Black Male, 34
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Ramos, Rafael
Complainant:	Black Male, 14
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Ramos, Rafael
Complainant:	Black Male, 34
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Black Male, 30-34
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Ramos, Rafael
Complainant:	Black Male, 34
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Ramos, Rafael
Complainant:	Black Male, 34
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Zacarese, Richard	Black Male, 1	Abuse of Authority: Frisk	Exonerated
Ramos, Rafael	Black Male, 34	Abuse of Authority: Frisk	Exonerated
Ramos, Rafael	Black Male, 14	Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)	Unfounded
Ramos, Rafael	Black Male, 34	Abuse of Authority: Property damaged	Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer	Black Male, 30-34	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop	Exonerated
Ramos, Rafael	Black Male, 34	Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)	Exonerated
Ramos, Rafael	Black Male, 34	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search	Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.