Complaint #200903330, February 2009

Incident: February 27, 2009
Received: March 5, 2009
Closed: March 29, 2010

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 23rd Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Matthew Crawley, Thomas Durkin

Officer:	Bedoya, Jorge
Complainant:	Black Male, 12
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Lillis, Daniel
Complainant:	Black Male, 12
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Lillis, Daniel
Complainant:	Black Male, 12
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Lillis, Daniel
Complainant:	Black Male, 12
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Bedoya, Jorge	Black Male, 12	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Lillis, Daniel	Black Male, 12	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Lillis, Daniel	Black Male, 12	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)	Unsubstantiated
Lillis, Daniel	Black Male, 12	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.