Complaint #200905624, April 2009

Incident: April 8, 2009
Received: April 12, 2009
Closed: July 14, 2010


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - bldg
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 73rd Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - OGA

Witness Officers: Evagelos Dimitrakakis, Susie Peralta, Joel Polichron, Nikki Prasad
Officer: Duguid, Andrew
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Sarrica, Frank
Complainant: Black Male, 45
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Sarrica, Frank
Complainant: Black Male, 45
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Ward, Christopher
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Sarrica, Frank
Complainant: Black Male, 45
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Sarrica, Frank
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Duguid, Andrew Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Substantiated (Charges)
Sarrica, Frank Black Male, 45 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Sarrica, Frank Black Male, 45 Force: Physical force Substantiated (Charges)
Ward, Christopher Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Substantiated (Charges)
Sarrica, Frank Black Male, 45 Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest Substantiated (Charges)
Sarrica, Frank Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Substantiated (Charges)

Penalties

Sarrica, Frank
Charges and Specifications - Guilty
Vacation: 10 days

Duguid, Andrew
Charges and Specifications - Guilty
Vacation: 5 days

Ward, Christopher
Charges and Specifications - Guilty
Vacation: 5 days


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.