Complaint #200906245, April 2009

Incident: April 17, 2009
Received: April 23, 2009
Closed: July 21, 2010

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 105th Precinct Queens
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Joseph Cancelino, Eric Deegan, Stephen Dillon, Michael Driscoll, Thomas Driscoll, James Gibson, Robert Honeyman, Michael Mckenna

Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Black Male, 18-20
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Black Male, 45-49
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer:	Castillo, Omar
Complainant:	Black Male, 24
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Question
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Bartoldus, Marique
Complainant:	Black Male, 19
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Castillo, Omar
Complainant:	Black Male, 55
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Castillo, Omar
Complainant:	Black Male, 19
Allegation:	Force: Hit against inanimate object
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Black Male, 18-20
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Officer(s) Unidentified

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Unknown Officer	Black Male, 18-20	Force: Physical force	Officer(s) Unidentified
Unknown Officer	Black Male, 45-49	Discourtesy: Word	Officer(s) Unidentified
Castillo, Omar	Black Male, 24	Abuse of Authority: Question	Unfounded
Bartoldus, Marique	Black Male, 19	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Castillo, Omar	Black Male, 55	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Castillo, Omar	Black Male, 19	Force: Hit against inanimate object	Exonerated
Unknown Officer	Black Male, 18-20	Force: Physical force	Officer(s) Unidentified

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.