Complaint #200907973, January 2008

Incident: January 4, 2008
Received: May 22, 2009
Closed: June 4, 2010


Reason for contact: Other
Location: Commercial building
In NYPD 120th Precinct Staten Island
Outcome: Arrest - assault (against a PO)

Witness Officers: Louis Contino, Lloyd Gregory, Maritza Ortiz, Keith Stroming
Officer: Uske, John
Complainant: White Male, 30
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Uske, John
Complainant: White Male, 25
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Putney, Robert
Complainant: White Male, 30
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Weinstein, Matthew
Complainant: White Male, 30
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Epstein, Derek
Complainant: White Male, 30
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Lewis, William
Complainant: White Male, 30
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Miscellaneous - Subject Terminated
Officer: Santangelo, Robert
Complainant: White Male, 30
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: White Male, 25-29
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Uske, John White Male, 30 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Uske, John White Male, 25 Discourtesy: Word Unfounded
Putney, Robert White Male, 30 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Weinstein, Matthew White Male, 30 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Epstein, Derek White Male, 30 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Lewis, William White Male, 30 Force: Physical force Miscellaneous - Subject Terminated
Santangelo, Robert White Male, 30 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer White Male, 25-29 Discourtesy: Word Unfounded

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.