Complaint #200914079, August 2009

Incident: August 29, 2009
Received: September 9, 2009
Closed: June 2, 2010


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 9th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime
Officer: Bellagamba, Michael
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 26
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Bellagamba, Michael
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 26
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Bellagamba, Michael
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 26
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Bellagamba, Michael
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 26
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Bellagamba, Michael
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 26
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Landry, Johnny
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 26
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Cawley, Gerald
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 26
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Bellagamba, Michael Hispanic Male, 26 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Unsubstantiated
Bellagamba, Michael Hispanic Male, 26 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Substantiated (Charges)
Bellagamba, Michael Hispanic Male, 26 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Exonerated
Bellagamba, Michael Hispanic Male, 26 Discourtesy: Word Unfounded
Bellagamba, Michael Hispanic Male, 26 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Exonerated
Landry, Johnny Hispanic Male, 26 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated
Cawley, Gerald Hispanic Male, 26 Discourtesy: Word Unfounded

Penalty

Bellagamba, Michael
Instructions


Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.