Complaint #200915228, September 2009

Incident: September 29, 2009
Closed: August 31, 2010

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
In NYPD 79th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - disorderly conduct

Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Black Female, 15-17
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Hachemeister, Jennifer
Complainant:	Black Female
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Miller, Jamaal
Complainant:	Black Male, 47
Allegation:	Force: Gun Pointed
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Miller, Jamaal
Complainant:	Black Male, 47
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Case, Philip
Complainant:	Black Male, 43
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Case, Philip
Complainant:	Black Male, 43
Allegation:	Offensive Language: Ethnicity
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Case, Philip
Complainant:	Black Male, 43
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Case, Philip
Complainant:	Black Male, 43
Allegation:	Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Peou, Heng
Complainant:	Black Male, 47
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Unknown Officer	Black Female, 15-17	Discourtesy: Word	Unfounded
Hachemeister, Jennifer	Black Female	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Miller, Jamaal	Black Male, 47	Force: Gun Pointed	Exonerated
Miller, Jamaal	Black Male, 47	Force: Physical force	Unfounded
Case, Philip	Black Male, 43	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Case, Philip	Black Male, 43	Offensive Language: Ethnicity	Unfounded
Case, Philip	Black Male, 43	Discourtesy: Word	Unfounded
Case, Philip	Black Male, 43	Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)	Unsubstantiated
Peou, Heng	Black Male, 47	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.