Complaint #201001131, January 2010

Incident: January 5, 2010
Received: January 25, 2010
Closed: May 10, 2010


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 79th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued
Officer: Nocerino, Michael
Complainant: Black Male, 34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Martins, Eddie
Complainant: Black Male, 34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Nocerino, Michael
Complainant: Black Male, 34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Nocerino, Michael
Complainant: Black Male, 34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Nocerino, Michael
Complainant: Black Male, 34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Nocerino, Michael
Complainant: Black Male, 34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Nocerino, Michael Black Male, 34 Abuse of Authority: Stop Exonerated
Martins, Eddie Black Male, 34 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Unsubstantiated
Nocerino, Michael Black Male, 34 Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Unsubstantiated
Nocerino, Michael Black Male, 34 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Exonerated
Nocerino, Michael Black Male, 34 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated
Nocerino, Michael Black Male, 34 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.