Complaint #201001609, February 2010

Incident: February 1, 2010
Received: February 2, 2010
Closed: December 14, 2010

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - auto
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 28th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Vamen Woodley

Officer:	Brito, Justino
Complainant:	Black Female, 21
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Brito, Justino
Complainant:	Black Female, 21
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Disla, Joaquin
Complainant:	Black Female, 21
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Disla, Joaquin
Complainant:	Black Female, 21
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Disla, Joaquin
Complainant:	Black Female, 21
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion:	Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Officer:	Taveras, Katherine
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Brito, Justino	Black Female, 21	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment	Unfounded
Brito, Justino	Black Female, 21	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Disla, Joaquin	Black Female, 21	Discourtesy: Word	Unfounded
Disla, Joaquin	Black Female, 21	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number	Unsubstantiated
Disla, Joaquin	Black Female, 21	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Unknown Officer		Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)	Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Taveras, Katherine		Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched	Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.