Complaint #201013906, October 2010

Incident: October 11, 2010
Received: October 12, 2010
Closed: January 9, 2012


Reason for contact: C/V intervened on behalf of/observed encounter w/3rd party
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 42nd Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Summons - disorderly conduct

Witness Officers: Luz Jorge, Samuel Mejias
Officer: Vega, Jose
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 24
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Vega, Jose
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Disposition: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Officer: Vega, Jose
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 30
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Multari, Christopher
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 24
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Vega, Jose
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 24
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Disposition: Instructions
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Vega, Jose Hispanic Female, 24 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Vega, Jose Hispanic Female, 24 Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Disposition: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Vega, Jose Hispanic Female, 30 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Unsubstantiated
Multari, Christopher Hispanic Female, 24 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Vega, Jose Hispanic Female, 24 Discourtesy: Word Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Disposition: Instructions

Penalty

Vega, Jose
Instructions


Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.