Complaint #201014991, October 2010

Incident: October 28, 2010
Received: October 30, 2010
Closed: September 22, 2011

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - auto
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 106th Precinct Queens
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Officer:	Gomes, David
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 17
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Gomes, David
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 17
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Petrizzo, Michael
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 17
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Petrizzo, Michael
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 17
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Maietta, Steven
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 17
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Petrizzo, Michael
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 17
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Action
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Gomes, David	Hispanic Male, 17	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Gomes, David	Hispanic Male, 17	Discourtesy: Word	Exonerated
Petrizzo, Michael	Hispanic Male, 17	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Petrizzo, Michael	Hispanic Male, 17	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Maietta, Steven	Hispanic Male, 17	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search	Exonerated
Petrizzo, Michael	Hispanic Male, 17	Discourtesy: Action	Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.