Complaint #201102590, February 2011

Incident: February 27, 2011
Received: March 1, 2011
Closed: July 18, 2012

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 67th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - resisting arrest

Witness Officers: Junior Lormil

Officer:	Pierre, Bruno
Complainant:	Black Male, 29
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Question
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Disposition:	Instructions
Officer:	Veve, Dalsh
Complainant:	Black Male, 29
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Pierre, Bruno
Complainant:	Black Male, 29
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Disposition:	No Disciplinary Action-DUP

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Pierre, Bruno	Black Male, 29	Abuse of Authority: Question	Substantiated (Charges)
	NYPD Disposition: Instructions
Veve, Dalsh	Black Male, 29	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)	Unsubstantiated
Pierre, Bruno	Black Male, 29	Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest	Substantiated (Charges)
	NYPD Disposition: No Disciplinary Action-DUP

Penalty

Pierre, Bruno

Penalty: Instructions

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.