Complaint #201105724, February 2011

Incident: February 24, 2011
Received: May 4, 2011
Closed: July 18, 2012


Document: Complaint Closing Report

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - subway
Location: Subway station/train
In NYPD 23rd Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued
Officer: Leek, Daniel
Complainant: Black Male, 30
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Leek, Daniel
Complainant: Black Male, 30
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Leek, Daniel
Complainant: Black Male, 30
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Figueroa, Edgar
Complainant: Black Male, 30
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Figueroa, Edgar
Complainant: Black Male, 30
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Figueroa, Edgar
Complainant: Black Male, 30
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Leek, Daniel
Complainant: Black Male, 30
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Figueroa, Edgar
Complainant: Black Male, 30
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Leek, Daniel Black Male, 30 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Leek, Daniel Black Male, 30 Abuse of Authority: Stop Substantiated (Charges)
Leek, Daniel Black Male, 30 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Unfounded
Figueroa, Edgar Black Male, 30 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Unfounded
Figueroa, Edgar Black Male, 30 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Figueroa, Edgar Black Male, 30 Abuse of Authority: Stop Substantiated (Charges)
Leek, Daniel Black Male, 30 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated
Figueroa, Edgar Black Male, 30 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated

Penalties

Leek, Daniel
No Disciplinary Action-DUP
No penalty

Figueroa, Edgar
No Disciplinary Action-DUP
No penalty


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.