Complaint #201209573, July 2012

Incident: July 13, 2012
Received: July 26, 2012
Closed: June 6, 2013


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - bldg
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 48th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Summons - other violation/crime
Officer: Ramos, Jose
Complainant: Black Male, 49
Allegation: Force: Handcuffs too tight
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Ramos, Jose
Complainant: Black Male, 49
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Leo, Brian
Complainant: Black Male, 49
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Torres, Alex
Complainant: Black Male, 49
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Ramos, Jose
Complainant: Black Male, 49
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Torres, Alex
Complainant: Black Male, 49
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Ramos, Jose
Complainant: Black Male, 49
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Ramos, Jose Black Male, 49 Force: Handcuffs too tight Unsubstantiated
Ramos, Jose Black Male, 49 Abuse of Authority: Stop Substantiated (Charges)
Leo, Brian Black Male, 49 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Torres, Alex Black Male, 49 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Ramos, Jose Black Male, 49 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Torres, Alex Black Male, 49 Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Unsubstantiated
Ramos, Jose Black Male, 49 Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons Substantiated (Charges)

Penalty

Ramos, Jose
Forfeit vacation 2 days
Closed: Resolved by plea, June 2015
APU Guilty
Forfeit vacation 2 days


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.