Complaint #201212404, September 2012

Incident: September 26, 2012
Received: September 27, 2012
Closed: August 13, 2013


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - auto
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 72nd Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued
Officer: Cracchiola, Justin
Complainant: Female, 22
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Dileo, Frank
Complainant: Female, 22
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Dileo, Frank
Complainant: Female, 22
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Cracchiola, Justin
Complainant: Female, 22
Allegation: Offensive Language: Ethnicity
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Disposition: APU Not guilty
Officer: Cracchiola, Justin
Complainant: Female, 22
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Disposition: APU Guilty
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Cracchiola, Justin Female, 22 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Unsubstantiated
Dileo, Frank Female, 22 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Unsubstantiated
Dileo, Frank Female, 22 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Substantiated (Charges)
Cracchiola, Justin Female, 22 Offensive Language: Ethnicity Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Disposition: APU Not guilty
Cracchiola, Justin Female, 22 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Disposition: APU Guilty

Penalties

Dileo, Frank
Forfeit vacation 5 days
Forfeit vacation 5 days
Closed: Guilty after trial, January 2016
APU Guilty
Forfeit vacation 5 days

Cracchiola, Justin
Forfeit vacation 8 days
Forfeit vacation 5 days
Closed: Guilty after trial, January 2016
Forfeit vacation 5 days


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.