Complaint #201212679, September 2012

Incident: September 30, 2012
Received: October 1, 2012
Closed: December 19, 2013


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - bldg
Location: Residential building
In NYPD 23rd Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Summons - disorderly conduct
Officer: Simo, Arnaldo
Complainant: Black Male, 45
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Simo, Arnaldo
Complainant: Black Male, 42
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Hernandez, Amparo
Complainant: Black Male, 45
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Simo, Arnaldo
Complainant: Black Male, 45
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Ramos, Juan
Complainant: Black Male, 45
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Garcia, Luis
Complainant: Black Male, 45
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Williams, Jeanne
Complainant: Black Male, 45
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Simo, Arnaldo Black Male, 45 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Substantiated (Charges)
Simo, Arnaldo Black Male, 42 Abuse of Authority: Stop Unsubstantiated
Hernandez, Amparo Black Male, 45 Abuse of Authority: Stop Unsubstantiated
Simo, Arnaldo Black Male, 45 Abuse of Authority: Stop Unsubstantiated
Ramos, Juan Black Male, 45 Abuse of Authority: Stop Unsubstantiated
Garcia, Luis Black Male, 45 Abuse of Authority: Stop Unsubstantiated
Williams, Jeanne Black Male, 45 Abuse of Authority: Stop Unsubstantiated

Penalty

Simo, Arnaldo
Forfeit vacation 5 days
Closed: Not guilty after trial, September 2015
APU Not guilty


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.