Complaint #201212754, September 2012

Incident: September 25, 2012
Received: October 2, 2012
Closed: March 3, 2014


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 19th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Joseph Cutrone, Sean Stclair
Officer: Hill, Daniel
Complainant: Black Male, 38
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Gaven, Timothy
Complainant: Black Male, 38
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Gaven, Timothy
Complainant: Black Male, 38
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Gaven, Timothy
Complainant: Black Male, 38
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Gaven, Timothy
Complainant: Black Male, 38
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Hill, Daniel
Complainant: Black Male, 38
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Hill, Daniel Black Male, 38 Abuse of Authority: Stop Substantiated (Charges)
Gaven, Timothy Black Male, 38 Abuse of Authority: Other Substantiated (Charges)
Gaven, Timothy Black Male, 38 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Gaven, Timothy Black Male, 38 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Substantiated (Charges)
Gaven, Timothy Black Male, 38 Abuse of Authority: Stop Substantiated (Charges)
Hill, Daniel Black Male, 38 Abuse of Authority: Other Substantiated (Charges)

Penalties

Hill, Daniel
Forfeit vacation 5 days
Closed: Not guilty after trial, May 2015
APU Not guilty

Gaven, Timothy
Forfeit vacation 5 days
Closed: Not guilty after trial, May 2015
APU Not guilty


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.