Complaint #201302410, March 2013

Incident: March 20, 2013
Received: March 29, 2013
Closed: February 5, 2014


Document: APU Quarterly Report summary (Wilding Aguasanta)

Reason for contact: Other
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 76th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued
Officer: Aguasanta, Wilding
Complainant: Black Male, 17
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Aguasanta, Wilding
Complainant: Black Male, 17
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Williams, Albert
Complainant: Black Male, 17
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Brooks, Cedric
Complainant: Black Male, 17
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Aguasanta, Wilding Black Male, 17 Abuse of Authority: Stop Unsubstantiated
Aguasanta, Wilding Black Male, 17 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Substantiated (Charges)
Williams, Albert Black Male, 17 Abuse of Authority: Stop Unsubstantiated
Brooks, Cedric Black Male, 17 Abuse of Authority: Stop Unsubstantiated

Penalty

Aguasanta, Wilding
Instructions
Closed: Plea set aside, Formalized Training, April 2016
APU Dismissed
Formalized Training


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.