Complaint #201303440, April 2013

Incident: April 11, 2013
Received: April 26, 2013
Closed: April 25, 2014


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 105th Precinct Queens
Outcome: Summons - other violation/crime
Officer: Fackler, Charles
Complainant: Male, 46
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Fackler, Charles
Complainant: Male, 46
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Lepore, Antonio
Complainant: Male, 46
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Sparacio, Daniel
Complainant: Male, 46
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Lepore, Antonio
Complainant: Male, 46
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Fackler, Charles Male, 46 Abuse of Authority: Stop Unsubstantiated
Fackler, Charles Male, 46 Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons Substantiated (Charges)
Lepore, Antonio Male, 46 Abuse of Authority: Stop Exonerated
Sparacio, Daniel Male, 46 Abuse of Authority: Stop Unsubstantiated
Lepore, Antonio Male, 46 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Unsubstantiated

Penalty

Fackler, Charles
Closed: Retained, with discipline, August 2014
APU Closed: Retained, with discipline
Instructions


Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.