Complaint #201304620, June 2012

Incident: June 22, 2012
Received: May 29, 2013
Closed: December 30, 2013


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Residential building
In NYPD 40th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Michael Dye, Jason Lopez, Andrew Rodriguez, Anthony Rumph
Officer: Ames, Keith
Complainant: Black Male, 36
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Ames, Keith
Complainant: Black Male, 36
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Medina, Gustavo
Complainant: Black Male, 36
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Medina, Gustavo
Complainant: Black Male, 36
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Ames, Keith
Complainant: Black Male, 36
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Medina, Gustavo
Complainant: Black Male, 36
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Ames, Keith
Complainant: Black Male, 36
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Ames, Keith Black Male, 36 Offensive Language: Race Unsubstantiated
Ames, Keith Black Male, 36 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Medina, Gustavo Black Male, 36 Discourtesy: Word Exonerated
Medina, Gustavo Black Male, 36 Force: Physical force Unfounded
Ames, Keith Black Male, 36 Force: Physical force Unfounded
Medina, Gustavo Black Male, 36 Force: Gun Pointed Exonerated
Ames, Keith Black Male, 36 Force: Gun Pointed Exonerated
Unknown Officer Black Male, 35-39 Discourtesy: Word Officer(s) Unidentified

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.