Complaint #201305776, June 2013

Incident: June 28, 2013
Closed: August 7, 2014

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD Midtown South Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Summons - disorderly conduct

Witness Officers: Alfredo Smith

Officer:	Rubenstrunk, Charles
Complainant:	White Male, 43
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Rubenstrunk, Charles
Complainant:	White Male, 43
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Rubenstrunk, Charles
Complainant:	White Male, 43
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Rubenstrunk, Charles
Complainant:	White Male, 43
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Charges)
Officer:	Rubenstrunk, Charles
Complainant:	White Male, 43
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Charges)

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Rubenstrunk, Charles	White Male, 43	Abuse of Authority: Frisk	Unsubstantiated
Rubenstrunk, Charles	White Male, 43	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Rubenstrunk, Charles	White Male, 43	Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)	Unsubstantiated
Rubenstrunk, Charles	White Male, 43	Abuse of Authority: Stop	Substantiated (Charges)
Rubenstrunk, Charles	White Male, 43	Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons	Substantiated (Charges)

Penalty

Rubenstrunk, Charles

APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, with discipline, December 2014

NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, with discipline

Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.